We went to the matinee, and went around after the performance, but the doorpeople said that because there was another show later on that Aly et al would not be making an appearance. Ah well, it was still very enjoyable.
) Of course it would not have been a complete waste of time cause there's plenty of fun stuff to do/see but seeing Aly is -obviously- the high point of this all and makes up for the enormously long (45minutes, no less) Amsterdam-London trip. I sure hope no Kittens have tickets for the 17march - 03april period cause that would be a bummer (maar zolang wij maar goed zitten maakt het me eigenlijk niks uit haha). Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious.
Even though the sound of it is something quite atrocious. ...
---------
"I want to be Byron... because I want to date young boys." Amber Benson
Quote:
‘When Harry Met Sally’ bland on stage
From Nwsource.com
Tuesday, February 24, 2004 · Last updated 12:38 p.m. PT
AP: ’When Harry Met Sally’ bland on stage
By MATT WOLF
ASSOCIATED PRESS WRITER
LONDON -- The fake orgasm scene is about the most real moment in the London stage premiere of "When Harry Met Sally ...," the much-loved Billy Crystal-Meg Ryan movie that has now become a harmless, bland star vehicle for television stars Luke Perry and Alyson Hannigan.
Perry, star of "Beverly Hills 90210," and Hannigan, Willow from "Buffy, the Vampire Slayer," are the latest American TV imports to try their luck on the British stage. You can bet they will not be the last.
One of the biggest hits of this past summer was a West End revival of the David Mamet play, "Sexual Perversity in Chicago," that featured Matthew Perry from "Friends" making his British stage debut.
It was almost a sure bet to transpose "Harry" from screen to stage. Audiences tend to respond to titles they already know, which is partly why "The Producers" and "Hairspray" have been such huge successes.
The difference here is that those Broadway musicals took their source films largely as a jumping-off point. The stage "Harry," though, is a case of slavish, almost pointless, imitation: It copies Nora Ephron’s screenplay nearly moment by moment - sometimes line by line - without ever capturing the film’s easy charm or wit.
The 1989 movie, directed by Rob Reiner, remains best remembered for the restaurant scene featuring Meg Ryan’s fake orgasm. The scene arrives on cue in the play near the end of Act 1. The throes of passion are moaned for optimal comic effect by Hannigan, who has inherited Ryan’s screen role as the perky, fastidious Sally. But too much of stage director Loveday Ingram’s production comes across as a Cliff Notes version of the film.
And the theater adaptation doesn’t even have Reiner’s mother on hand to utter the now classic quip, following Sally’s cries of ecstasy: "I’ll have whatever she’s having." In the play, the line has been handed to a campy young man sitting in a booth next to the couple, and it lands without comic effect.
Sure, a few of the details are different. In the movie, Harry meets Sally when they share a car ride from Chicago, where they have been at college, to New York. Marcy Kahan’s stage adaptation starts with budding journalist Sally, age 21, already in Manhattan, where rising corporate lawyer Harry arrives to paint her apartment.
The two have a love-hate relationship and take more than a dozen years to decide what we can tell from the start: However much they may spar, the pair are every bit as meant for each other as the numerous couples whose filmed testimonials of affection appear throughout the film.
The stage production includes its own droll sequence of such testimonials - a screen drops in between scenes to project them - including that of two gay men who first met during a Metropolitan Opera production of "Der Rosenkavalier."
In pointed comparison with the slow build of romance that drives the central plot, Harry and Sally’s two best friends, Jack (Jake Broder) and Marie (Sharon Small), fall in love almost instantly. They must then wait for Harry and Sally to see beyond the Platonic confines of their rapport.
The portly Broder all but steals the show from stage neophytes Hannigan, who has never done theater at all before, and Perry, whose limited experience includes the Broadway revival of "The Rocky Horror Show."
Though engaging, Perry is too lightweight a presence for the part, and he doesn’t sound comfortable with the Jewish-etched zing of Ephron’s writing, which was so perfectly matched to Crystal.
Hannigan is more audible, certainly, but she brings a somewhat shrill quality to the less rewarding of the two leading roles. No wonder the fake orgasm shows the actress at her best: For that moment, at least, Hannigan looks as if she is having fun, and the audience, however briefly, is, too.
The play, which opened Feb. 20, is booked through May 29 at the Theatre Royal, Haymarket.
Quote:
ALYSON HANNIGAN, West End Girl
The following text is a somewhat expanded and slightly altered version of a review which was printed in the February 13th edition of "Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung" in German. It’s about A.H.‘s debut as a stage actress in the role of Sally in Marcy Kahan’s theatrical version of Nora Ephron's "When Harry Met Sally" at the Theatre Royal Haymarket in London, co-starring Luke Perry as Harry. As with the Amber Benson stuff elsewhere on this site, I translated it myself and hope it’s readable & you enjoy it.
- Dietmar Dath
In the year 1989 a quirky and smart screenplay by Nora Ephron allowed director Rob Reiner to guide Meg Ryan and Billy Crystal towards delivering some of the best lines these two actors ever got to speak. "When Harry Met Sally" was quite a good motion picture for many reasons, not the least of which seems to be – at least in retrospect – that it made fun of two of the most common misconceptions concerning love and/or sex that were passed around in the wake of the "sexual liberation" of the 1970s. The first of these two charmingly idealistic, but ultimately unworkable ideas which can be summed up as "love exists to conquer the system" was corrected in the course of Reiner‘s comedy by a crafty tongue-in-cheek-presentation of the ways in which people who actually profit from said system – by not being forced to worry over basic necessities of life too much, for example – namely, two innocently self-centred Yuppies as only the Eighties could have created, may sometimes be granted by a benevolent goddess of erotic mischief, the unlikely ability – not to mention the time – to enact complicated ballet-exercises of love, attraction, withdrawal and so forth for our enjoyment. Enjoying that might have been a guilty pleasure for us enlightened liberals, but an instructive one nonetheless.
The other weak post-68-idea which Reiner’s film subverted was the kitschy radical slogan that "private lives of any kind are a bourgeois diversion and shall be smashed by the righteous fury of the politically minded". For if you but watched these two deliciously confused products of corporate America carefully enough, you had to admit that their fuzzy decadence was something that should not be lost or discarded, but rather preserved by an utopian, even a post-revolutionary society: let’s never give up the games people play.
Fifteen years and countless pamphlets by kind-hearted sociologists of sex later, stage director Loveday Ingram now presents a stage version of "When Harry Met Sally" at London’s Haymarket Theatre (that’s one of those "West End"-venues one reads & hears about so much). Marcy Kahan, the Canadian-American playwright who adapted Ephron’s original screenplay for this production, managed to get everything right that Ephron herself somehow failed to recapture in most of her other similar efforts following "When Harry Met Sally", from the long-winded "Sleepless in Seattle" up to the feeble "You’ve Got Mail".
Kahan’s version showcases all of the original’s strengths while discovering some new ones only visible today: everything she preserves or inserts is historically precise and emotionally true, the time is shifted from the space between the seventies and the eighties to the one between the eighties and the new millennium, the right TV shows are mentioned ("West Wing", "Jerry Springer") and Harry’s ex-wife gets to spout pseudo-hipster-jargon cut from original nineties fabric, remarking about a restaurant: "it’s so retro, it’s avant-garde".
Even those endearing video-inserts of longtime companions telling their tales of true love and commitment get recontextualized: This time around, they feature a harmlessly middle-class gay couple as well and were made by Sally’s friend Marie who is now a video artist instead of a storefront-decorator. On top of that, they get dissed for being "schmaltzy" by the ever-sarcastic Harry. Speaking of Harry, whom you might remember as an eloquent, misanthropic pessimist obsessed with doom and thanatopsis in Crystal’s quite fetching interpretation: here he‘s not so much a timeless existentialist but rather a boyish, yet at times amusingly savage social heretic – you’d have to be pretty grumpy not to enjoy watching Luke Perry spitting out words like "über-ruthless“ , "fascists" and "corporate yuppies".
Kahan knows her characters – and what’s more, she’s quite aware of the necessities of form such a reworking of already well-done material entails. On the characters, she writes in her short commentary: "What they find is each other, but since Harry is a depressive, domineering sexual opportunist and Sally a perky, romantic obessive compulsive (I‘m exaggerating ever so slightly), they don’t hit it off."
On the form of the play, Kahan has this to say: "A funny thing happened on the way to the end of the first draft. I discovered that "When Harry Met Sally", deep down in its deepest impulses, is really a stage play. This has to do with the differences between plays and movies. As the playwight Christopher Hampton once defined it, a theatre play dramatises "the slow unfurling of a tightly knit argument, powered by thetoric, while a screenplay relies on the eloquence of its images."
As it was with Ephron and Reiner, the very best thing about a solidly planned textual fundament for any dramatic presentation is that it allows the actors to show their stuff as best they can. And these actors fully deliver here.
Roughly half of the people present at the preview I’ve seen could be (or actually are) familiar with Alyson Hannigan by way of her former roles as Willow on "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" and Michelle in the hugely succesful "American Pie" films – you can tell because of their age, their T-Shirts (one woman has a lovely embossed Buffy-Shirt that’s probably homemade, I’ve never seen it before anywhere and believe me, I‘ve seen and worn plenty of Buffywear), their fannish demeanor (I mean that in a good way since I’m in no position to throw the first stone) and their comments during intermission time. Hannigan has reportedly never stood on a stage before, but she captures the mood and uses the possibilities as I‘ve heard she’s been itching to try this one for a while. The voice carries, the gestures beckon, the first clumsy New-Year’s-kiss between our two star-crossed yuppies is placed by this incarnation of Sally’s with impeccable awkwardness and the famous fake orgasm-scene gets a deservedly sustained round of applause (by the way, it’s also followed by one of Kahan‘s nice little upgrading touches: the person who says "I’ll have what she’s having" is not, as in the movie, a middle-aged woman, but rather a good-looking young man).
Hannigan plays it slightly more controlled than Ryan did, her kind of cute is a bit more cerebral, sweet & sour instead of sweet & uptight. Some tell-tale little tics and accidental parallels connect this role with others she’s played, the adorable little "och"-sigh when she’s exasperated is there, and when the Buffy-crowd detects an Apple-computer onstage, we naturally think of our favourite technopagan wicca, even the way she wrinkles her nose or slings a sheet around her body (don‘t get me started on "Seeing Red") suggest a scent of déjà-vu, but that’s full-blown Buffymania for you.
Be that as it may, Hannigan’s interpretation of what it means to be a latter-day-Sally is especially delightful in that it seems to wryly comment on the fate of such roles since 1989 – this Sally has clearly seen some romantic comedies herself and wears this sense of romantic-comedy-erudition like her too-big-aerobic-T-Shirt and green stretch pants in a newly inserted workout scene – even when her tongue slips, it tends to make sense: once, she declares that she’s just arrived in L.A. instead of New York, and of course that’s just as possible for this new Sally, Nineties-wise, as does showing us the different ways of sitting on a sofa (when you’re Sally and someone you just met is shamelessly hitting on you, you don’t sit there like you do with your best female friend, discussing each other’s love-lives).
Hannigan’s fans, judging from my own reactions and from what I‘ ve heard others say during the intermission, are thus completely satisified and pleased, as was to be expected. Compared to this – for people like me, the evening‘s main attraction – the very capable supporting cast members, especially Sharon Small as Marie and Jake Broder as Harry’s best friend Jack – the movie introduced him as Jess – are merely very competent and admirably restrained, they serve the whole thing well by being anything but movie-actors, absolutely devoted to delivering the line, making the point, hitting the note which cannot be repeated.
Wherever there’s new dialogue ("Old people are lucky – they know their story" sounds more like a novel than a play, but works nicely) it fits, and some of the things the film had which you cannot reproduce onstage are replaced by absolutely adequate replacements: the autumn walk is suggested by psychedelicately falling larger-than-life-leaves on video and the long drive to New York gets transformed into a paintjob for Harry which takes several days because Sally wants her new N.Y. apartment done in a very specific way ("White verging on white" as he mockingly calls it).
Surprisingly for those of us who thought he might not have it in him, the male lead delivers the goods. Billy Crystal's Harry is a tough act to follow, let alone surpass, but Luke Perry, ageing Beverly Hills 90210-heartthrob, mouths off and flatters, swings and swoons, sings and throws his body into the ring (once, we even get a glimpse of his backside) in so energetic and engaging a fashion that you cannot help but cheer him when he finally wins Sallys heart – the hair may be falling out, but if your weapons include natural sardonic wit and the will to learn from experience, you might just get your heart’s desire, even in erotically highly challenged times like ours.
Quote:
When Harry Met Sally
25 February 2004
Alyson Hannigan makes West End debut.
Luckily, I must be the only person not have seen the Meg Ryan/Tom Hanks original. Fans of the film may find their enjoyment marred, however.
For my fellow virgins, When Harry Met Sally concerns the will-they-won't-they friendship between the new-to-Manhatten Sally and true New Yorker Harry.
Can Alyson Hannigan cut it as a West End star? The answer is largely yes. Alyson has a certain degree of stage presence and manages to banish memories of Willow, thanks largely due to a change of accent. Unfortunately the demands of the role require her to age thirteen years, with the Sally of 2000 considerably older than our Alyson. This is largely where her performance falls flat – we just don't really believe that any time has passed. Seeing little Willow grunt and groan in the famous restaurant scene is also a bit disconcerting.
Luke Perry also abandons his husky Beverly Hills 90120 voice for one with a hint of roguish charm and the audience certainly warmed to his performance. And yes, we do get to see rather a lot of the former teen idol and the years have been kind.
Unfortunately, while individually appealing, there's little chemistry between the two. Initially this isn't a problem – Harry and Sally are supposed to find each other annoying - but we never believe they could fall in love.
Fortunately, there is admirable support from Kevin Collins and Sharon Small as friends who Harry and Sally try to pair-off. Their performances are so strong that you can't help but wonder what could have been if they had been put centre stage.
Another major ingredient of the play is a series of When We Met filmed vox pops featuring aged American couples telling us how they met. This device is either sweet or stomach churning – I'd go for the latter. Also, for a show that is presumably trying to distance itself from the original movie it seems odd to cut to filmed inserts.
Staging of the piece is stylish and minimalist which, while this adds a sort of timeless quality, doesn't help convey the passing of a time. Music is also timeless, with Jamie Cullum providing a jazz score and lending his unique vocal talents to the classic It Had To Be You.
While When Harry Met Sally has it faults the material of the piece is strong enough to amuse. Alyson Hannigan and Luke Perry make appealing leads, but a lack of chemistry sometimes kills the romance.
When Harry Met Sally is on at the Theatre Royal, Haymarket for a run of sixteen weeks. Click on the links below for more information and to enter our competition to win tickets.
When Harry Met Sally website
Win tickets
---------
"I want to be Byron... because I want to date young boys." Amber Benson
Quote:
www.thestage.co.uk/paper/0409/0201.shtml
When Harry Met Sally
Theatre Royal, Haymarket, London
Based on the 1989 movie, this play tells the story of a couple so intent on proving that they can be friends without sleeping together, they nearly miss the fact that they have fallen in love.
Luke Perry has been perfectly cast as Harry. We can easily accept his tales of sexual conquests throughout Manhattan, although Perry also successfully projects the vulnerability hidden beneath Harry's dark side. Alyson Hannigan as Sally sounded desperate to project in the opening scenes but, mirroring her character, she matured and blossomed as the story unfolded. This seemed more prominent as Sally's friendships came to the fore, primarily with Harry, but also with the fine support offered by the excellent Sharon Small and Jake Broder as the couple's friends.
The design by Ultz paid homage to films, with wooden tabs recreating mid-shots, split screen and ultimately Cinemascope scenes, reaffirming its alliance with the original. The adaptation by Marcy Kahan proves fairly slick with some perfectly acceptable inventions to ease the transition from screen to stage and also a few cheeky surprises on some of its most well-known gags.
The big question is whether or not this play has legs after such success on the screen. The creative team appears so desperate to please audiences by making this play look like a movie that intellectual theatregoers may sneer with derision. However, it is unlikely anybody saw the movie for intellectual stimulation and audiences should accept the play for its witty script, fine acting and sentiment rather than its concept.
By Paul Vale
Now that`s one show I`d pay good money to see!!!
She`s incredibly slender and seems taller than she appears on screen, with the shiniest hair I`ve ever seen on just about anyone!!!
Once again, as other people have noted on the board, she was remarkably gracious and patient with the fans, posing for photographs, signing autographs and just generally looking very gorgeous! Next time I go, and there most definately will be a next time, I`ll be a little braver!!! So there you have it, my first Aly experience, what a gal
Quote:
enjoyment.independent.co.uk/theatre/reviews/story.jsp?story=497074
Supposedly, West End punters are rolling up to see the theatrical "remake" of the 1989 Hollywood rom-com When Harry Met Sally like so many ex-lovers falling into the arms of an old flame. Sure, the night has its giggles and romantic moments as Luke Perry's Harry and Alyson Hannigan's Sally fail to get it together, manage the feat years later, break up and make up. It's that age-old love/hate formula of Much Ado's Beatrice and Benedick and Pride and Prejudice, plus the teasing question every modern-day hetero can relate to, namely, "Can best mates of the opposite sex be simply platonic?" As regards the script, writer Nora Ephron's repartee can still be irresistibly funny, with farcically demanding restaurant orders from the lady's side and shameless propositioning from the other. Adapter Marcy Kahan also updates the action, so the relationship now runs from 1987 to New Year's Eve 1999. This works fine in so far as the stereotypical gender gulf still raises a laugh of recognition, especially when Perry carelessly proclaims that men always hope a 30-second post-coital hug will suffice.
However, the film's multiple short scenes are condensed, so the relationship's developments over time are not conveyed so deftly, and the set design by Ultz is dreadful: a drab minimalist white box that is obviously meant to be cool. In the the movie, Billy Crystal and Meg Ryan are always on the move or, at least, in touch with the bustle of Manhattan. They share a car, cross paths at the airport, lark around in shops etc. Director Loveday Ingram has no imaginative alternatives. We are stuck in windowless apartments or in a gym where everyone just cycles on the spot. For Central Park we get artistically third-rate, computer-generated leaves projected on the back wall - hardly compensation for cinema lovers.
The cast could be worse. Mr Perry (from TV's Beverly Hills 90210) is lithe and Hannigan (aka Willow, chum to Buffy the vampire slayer) has two tender close encounters with him when they hover on the brink of kissing. However, he isn't quite enough of an arrogant prick to start with and his gloomy side is unconvincing. And this Sally's obsessive streak isn't bound up with attractively nutty energy to make you believe she'd fake an orgasm in a restaurant. The inserted "documentary" clips of long-married couples ring embarrassingly false, as well. Not a performance to make one moan with excitement.
Quote:
observer.guardian.co.uk/review/story/0,6903,1158516,00.html
Marcy Kahan's adaptation of When Harry Met Sally is almost painless and totally pointless. Alyson Hannigan and Luke Perry are cute as the friends who discover they can be lovers too. Ultz provides a smart design - an oblong box across which flash conventional New York scene changes - that will allow all theatre-phobes to pretend they're in the cinema. Nora Ephron's script is smoothly tweaked so that everything takes place in doors and a decade later.
Half the time, this looks like an unsuccessful episode of Friends, with Sally, defined by her alphabetised video index and her picky food habits, as a dead ringer for Monica. The rest of the time, it's on a par with the most famous scene in the Meg Ryan-Billy Crystal movie. A good fake.
Still buzzing from yesterday’s experience of seeing Aly. Our highly anticipated trip came to an end today and I must say the play itself was more than enjoyable. Seeing Aly at such relatively close proximity (it’s really a small theatre) was awesome and my partner in crime (to be called p.i.c. from here on) and I were enjoying it immensely. Of course we are somewhat biased but I still don’t think it deserves the harsh criticizms it is getting but who cares....... Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious.
Even though the sound of it is something quite atrocious. ...
WFB
). She could not tell it was a WT comic, I had it turned to the inner page with Chris Golden´s sig and she asked me who´s it was. She sounded curious and seemed a bit surprised at hearing it was Chris Golden´s. Whatever, she was very sweet and nice to everyone. Thanking people etc. I did not ask to have my picture taken with her as I hate having my pic taken, but she certainly would have allowed it. It was cool enough seeing her up close being all gracious and sweet.
I´ll ask someone to put up the vids and pics I have later.
- - - - - - - - - - -
"Hard work often pays off after time but laziness always pays off now!"
Quote:
ugh, i am jealous
Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious.
Even though the sound of it is something quite atrocious. ...
WFB
Quote:
For some reason I found it a tad amusing that Aly was curious about Chris Golden's autograph, she's probably used to seeing Amber's...
- - - - - - - - - - -
"No more twat. No more twat for me. Twat gets me into trouble!" - Crack Whore Jenny, The L Word
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests