Skip to content


Is Willow a feminist?

Anything about Willow & Tara, Alyson Hannigan and Amber Benson.

Is Willow a feminist?

Postby xita » Tue May 14, 2002 5:39 pm

This is a spoilery conversation about Willow's actions at least in Villains. Now, let me state, that what I am about to post is not an excuse for what ME has done, it doesn't make me less angry and it does not make me forgive them. I think this is a case where people got to wrapped up in the story and forgot that they were dealing with characters that people loved.



For the record, I have never ever said that Joss Whedon is a homophobe or that Steven Deknight is a homophobe. Steve is an ass for sure. The lesbian cliche applies not because of intent but because of the impact it has. The story that apparently they are trying to tell could have been done with Anya, it could have been done with Buffy, they chose to do it with Willow and Tara and that I will never understand or forgive. I am not taking back any of what I have said, I think the connection between magic and lesbianism is disturbing , when it is magic that leads to Willow's downfall. Killing Tara right after sex is unforgivable and I never want to see that again. And like I said he lost track of the characters because he got too busy trying to tell a story that he forgot he was dealing with Willow, who has shown nothing but love for humanity and this thing presented to us now is not Willow and will never be Willow.



There is the whole obvious, "I am going to make Willow like Vamp Willow" thing, because she's a geek and has control power issues. I don't buy that. That is not a story to me. That's too contrite.



So, all season I have been seeing the misogyny, relentless. I have been crying for a twist at the end that makes it all right. And instead I get a willow that is the season's big bad. So not only are women attacked all season long but they are blamed for everything and made to seem like the biggest bad that ever lived.



But, is that really what I am supposed to think? I'll be honest, I watched bits of the show, villains. Nowadays, I can't bear to watch the show in sequence. So I watch bits, out context so that they don't impact me in the same way. I can't deal with pain right now. So I watched Willow get Warren. I wasn't thinking of this as Willow. It's not her. That made it easier. I saw a warrior, getting my revenge. I saw her destroy, humiliate, torture and kill Warren.



Let me tell you, I know some will think I am freak but I enjoyed every minute of it. This guy is the worst kind of scum that ever walked the earth. A woman hater of the worst kind. Clearly Warren had it against women and he killed the type of woman I would imagine he would hate the most, earth loving, gentle kind lesbian. During Villains, he is confronted by dead Katrina who calls him on his shit and he has the nerve to say "because you deserved it bitch." whoa Then later to Willow "women, you're just like the rest of them, mind games." whoa.. again. What a bastard. What a pig. But DMW takes care of him, and honestly, it wasn't enough. I hope you all know that this is fiction and not reality and I am not blood thirsty in real life.



This whole season has seen an attack on women and here finally is the avenger. DMW. But is she evil like Buffy would have us think, are we supposed to hate her for being so cruel? Or are we supposed to cheer her on for bringing this triumph to women? I am thinking the latter, at least in this episode, I am not hip on the details of the next 2 and what DMW's motivations are.



As I drove home today, I remembered an interview I read a long time ago, where Joss talked about "I spit on your grave." If you haven't seen this movie, don't rush to see it. It's horrible, exploitative and just ick. But it has some of the most gruesome revenge sequences you can find. I watched this before I read this interview because my gf had been interested in seeing this cult film, cause she'd heard about it. So I paid close attention when Joss talked about it:



Quote:


SE-G: A lot of manga (Japanese comics -- ed.) features cool women characters that I think you would dig.





JW: On the one hand it seems diggable, but I'm a big fan of puberty and people who've been through it.





SE-G: There's that perception about manga, but a lot of manga heroines are actually teenagers. I think the Japanese culture or media just isn't as puritan about showing a 17 year-old undressed. Younger ages are considered adult in other countries. Sometimes manga can seem overrun with that, but I don't believe many mainstream American comics are better.





JW: There's a comics artist I won't name who I've talked to. His creation is really popular, I guess, but there's this weird thing, where I guess she was molested, and that's part of the story. But you know, she's a young girl who looks like a Playboy model in her undies. I wanted to molest her, too, you know? The message that sends is weird, and I don't go for it.





Because of stuff like that I went away from comics for a long time. Everything seemed to be soft core and all of it was disguised as empowerment. "I have the power to have my shirt ripped, and now you can see my nipples! Ah-ha!"





The other thing is that, inevitably, something that is fringe culturally will probably yield the most exploitative and the most feminist stuff. The most radically political stuff gets mixed in that way, like the '70s horror movies. I Spit on Your Grave is like that.





SE-G: That's pretty much a genre of its own -- exploited women coming into their own and taking their anger out on the people who hurt them.





JW: Yeah. They show this woman being raped, and they keep raping her, but then she gets this incredible revenge. A lot of the Romero movies were the same way, with incredible feminist icons that nobody really noticed. It's amazing to me that there isn't more of it in our culture.




Is DMW an incredible feminist icon? This may not be the kind of feminism everyone is comfortable with. As a fan of Hothead Paisan, I'd be a hypocrite if I didn't say I am comfortable with this kind of feminism. However, I don't think it is a type of social commentary that your typical network viewer can handle. Both of these examples are clearly not mainstream.



I can't speak for Joss Whedon and what his intentions were, but there is evidence that he has given this kind of plot some thought. DMW is perhaps the avenging force for women this season, though it all depends on how she is portrayed in the next few episodes. While this event may be triumphant, the effects of it may be too damaging. I hope not, I hope that DMW is not eventually seen as the true enemy in her quest to end the world.



Again, for this theory I really had to set aside the fact that this is Willow, I could see myself pulling a DMW before I could see her doing it. I also had to set aside that he had to kill Tara to do this. I don't think either one of these is necessary, it wasn't necessary to use the lesbians to do this. Buffy perhaps would have been a better vehicle, perhaps even Anya. Because it is too easy to cross the line between man hater and lesbian, where those issues would not be present in an Anya or buffy scenario and you wouldn't need to touch the lesbian cliche.



Unfortunately a misguided Joss Whedon failed to see the repercussions of this storyline, failed to anticipate the lesbian cliche and the fact that most people won't see DMW as a feminist icon but merely a murderer. He failed to see the damage that this would do. I am not saying the message is right even if people get it, I am not saying this is the right kind of feminism to see. I am saying that this is what I think Joss Whedon was trying to do. I think that it has turned out to be the biggest mess he has ever made. It's all fucked up now.



But thinking about this makes me feel better, because I can think that I have not been completely betrayed. I am still tremendously angry and hurt and the only true way to even begin to make this up to me is to bring back Tara.

- - - - - - - - - - - -

"Everything is turning out so dark..."

"No, it's okay. Lost is good. Willow and I always know how to find each other!"

Edited by: xita  at: 5/14/02 5:13:16 pm
xita
 


Re: Is Willow a feminist?

Postby BBOvenGuy » Tue May 14, 2002 5:49 pm

Ah, but Xita, if DMW is a feminist icon, doesn't that suggest that women must in some way give up who they are in order to strike back at their oppressors?



Personally, I can't get the fact that it's Willow out of my head - which probably explains why I'm not watching the episode. Sure, it's all well and good for Willow to get back at Warren, but can't she do it as Willow? As it is, the power to seek her vengeance comes from something outside of herself. She needs dark forces to turn her into something else. But wait - Willow has a brilliant scientific mind and is a wiz with computers. Why does she have to get help from somewhere else? And also, these dark forces encourage her to do something that she wouldn't do as herself. Willow may kill demons and vampires in the heat of battle, but she's not a cold-blooded murderer.



In short, if DMW really is some kind of "Feminist Avenger," what does that have to say about the power women have within themselves? Not a whole lot. Granted, my perspective is as an outsider, but that's the way I see it.

------------------------------------------------
"We don't want to feel less when we have finished a book; we want to feel that new possibilities of being have been opened to us. We don't want to close a book with a sense that life is totally unfair and that there is no light in the darkness; we want to feel that we have been given illumination." - Madeleine L'Engle

BBOvenGuy
 


Re: Is Willow a feminist?

Postby xita » Tue May 14, 2002 6:03 pm

Bob, my post was just a way to try to understand what might have been going on in Joss' head. I don't agree with it. I said, Willow is the worst character to pick to do this with. But let's remember it is she who chopped off the penis head. If that's not forshadowing, I don't know what is, they even remind us of it in the previous episode. The problem is all the crossed messages that they are sending because Willow is a lesbian because they killed Tara the lesbian.



It is an interesting message to send in a movie, where the character is essetially a stranger. It is unfathomable when it is done with someone as kind as Willow is. So no, I don't think that it sends a good message, because of the context and because who they used to send it. The message itself is something that I understand, that is what I was trying to get out of my system.

- - - - - - - - - - - -

"Everything is turning out so dark..."

"No, it's okay. Lost is good. Willow and I always know how to find each other!"

xita
 


Re: Is Willow a feminist?

Postby maudmac » Tue May 14, 2002 6:10 pm

Before I get into any big, deep thoughts about your post, xita, I have to say that I have been thinking about Hothead Paisan for months now. I've wondered what she would do about all of this. And it hasn't escaped me that she became Hothead in response to the media's portrayal of women.



Big, deep thoughts are going to have to wait for now. But I just had to comment on the first mention I have seen in years of one of my absolute favorite fictional characters of all time.



Edited to add: I'm a Willowhand now! *mind boggles at what this implies and ends up in a very nice place*

------------------------------
...so don't let them bring you down and don't let them fuck you around cuz those are your arms, that is your heart and no no they can't tear you apart.

--- Kathleen Hanna

Edited by: maudmac at: 5/14/02 5:16:38 pm
maudmac
 


Re: Is Willow a feminist?

Postby Wiccagrrl313 » Tue May 14, 2002 6:14 pm

Interesting ideas, Xita, and I think it has some merit. I will tell you, though, I think one of the most disturbing aspects to this storyline (and there are a *lot* of disturbing aspects to this) is the idea of Willow needing to/being drained of her power. We need to see how it plays out, of course, but it's an edgy issue to take a show that has been very much about empowerment and do a power corrupts storyline.



Tracy

******************


VILLOV

I troost yuu. Hurty flurty schnipp schnipp!

Wiccagrrl313
 


Re: Is Willow a feminist?

Postby Bagheera » Tue May 14, 2002 6:36 pm

I agree with all of the above. This Season has abounded with the most incredibly mysogynistic events and images. Space and time don't permit an exhaustive list, but these have included:

- Rape, date rape (if a distinction needed to be made)

- Pornography and male voyeurism

- A humiliating sexual relationship (B/S)

- Financial institutions and bureaucracies being unsympathetic to single women

- Even the supposedly comedic elements of the geeks (Jonathan's magic bone and Warren's magic rocks)



The climactic response to this being Willow shifting into vengeance mode and trying to destroy the world.



It's been so intense and so OTT that i agree that without some kind of healing or reversal, this season won't make any sense.



If the end is Xander talking Willow down and Giles/Anya draining her power, I think I may just destroy my TV set.



And even there is a reversal, can I ever trust Joss or ME again?JW is the embodiment of the Henry Rollins song "Liar"

Bagheera
 


Re: Is Willow a feminist?

Postby MissPsychoPepSquad » Tue May 14, 2002 7:32 pm

Xita - this is a very interesting set of ideas (and you get a fierce "you go girl" for expressing them so eloquently!) and I will confess that I am right there with DMW, hoping Warren feels it as bad as he should...



but then I think of two things that terrify me:



1) Warren doesn't get it. He's never going to get it. He's a rapist woman-hating fuck who keeps his "you deserved it bitch" "mind games" bravado up until the moment he dissolved into fear (NOT contrition or remorse, mind you - FEAR). Willow's "talk" is wasted on him. The female avenger can make him learn nothing. She can only destroy. And where does that get her?



2) If the spoilers for the finale are correct, our sweet little girl is going to try and destroy the world. This is different than killing Warren. Like, maxi-wig different. What this says to me is that a woman enraged, empowered, in mindset of vengeance is SO out of touch with reality that she actually cannot exist in it, and as such must destroy or be destroyed.



What this says is: powerful women threaten the natural order. They must be destroyed/contained/weakened.



Seems like I heard this in Sunday School, or maybe some other places...don't know.



I want Willow to have power and I want Willow to feel her well-deserved rage...but I just don't see Joss' master plan on this one as anything but embracing a view of women that's been around for, well, centuries.



Still. I want to believe there's a reason. Joss once said he wanted Buffy, although in a magical demon-infested universe, to imitate and describe real life problems and experiences. Maybe there's something, a thread of an idea, that he's trying to express about the redeemable and the unredeemable...I don't know. Help. I want my Willow back.





MissPsychoPepSquad
 


Re: Is Willow a feminist?

Postby ruby » Tue May 14, 2002 7:39 pm

Smart words, xita.



I realize that that brutal treatment of women this season has been about as subtle as an ax in the back. But if the feminist message comes in the season finale, it's too little, too late.



ME has wanted to play it both ways. IF (and that's a big if) the huge moment of Buffy-patented empowerment that's meant to redeem the whole season comes in the last 2 hours, they've still spent 20 hours of the season showing the victimization, murder, torture, and rape of women, and playing it for entertainment value. It's a sick double standard. Honestly, what I wouldn't give for 5 minutes alone with Marti Noxon...



But seeing Warren flayed gave me no gratification whatsoever. I hope it wasn't supposed to. It's meeting hate with hate. If my lover was killed, you can bet I'd go for blood. But Buffy has always, no matter how far it probed into moral ambiguity, managed to show the high ground. I'm not talking about lousy half-assed lip service. I'm talking the Powerful Underlying Message. And they've completely lost that now. Willow can never be a feminist icon because she's let her baser instincts overwhelm her intellect and--most importantly for this character--her heart. She sacrificed her identity to Warren, which is what he wanted from women all along.

Smashed. Wrecked. Gone.

ruby
 


Re: Is Willow a feminist?

Postby eccentrictulip » Tue May 14, 2002 7:49 pm

xita, i was thinking along the same lines you were--i actually do see DMW as some sort of twisted feminist icon. i haven't watched the show for very long at all, but from what i knew about it before, it had some very strong female roles in it. now, when i started watching, buffy was all dead, and soon after, willow was consumed and nearly defeated by magic. buffy was having some serious issues letting spike walk all over her. so, here i am, watching all this thinking, damn, this show has sucked all the power right out of these women....buffy was emotionally so weak for most of the season. and willow turned into a train wreck (or, well, car wreck) not long after the premiere....tara was the only strong one left. so, they take her away. and i'm still very pissed off about that, but in the process, they gave us the ultimate feminist--if you mess with DMW, you'll pay. she's not taking shit from anyone. it was so nice to see an outwardly strong woman for once this season. looks like ME tried to give the women of the show back some of their power....it was still hard for me to watch DMW kill warren... i know it's not willow--it's the embodiment of her vengence and hatred and pain caused by warren. but, i know that willow is still in there somewhere, so it was tough....but you know what? all i have to say is GO WILLOW. kick some ass....might not be perfect, but at least DMW is one lady who isn't going to let herself be trampled on....

sorry if my rant didn't make much sense....and just for the record, i do hope *our* willow comes back soon, cause all that black? just not working.....

*please use both hands....*

eccentrictulip
 


Re: Is Willow a feminist?

Postby kyraroc » Tue May 14, 2002 8:54 pm

Willow as a feminist icon for killing Warren? Maybe that's what she was envisioned as - and I'm not sure it is, given how clearly the show seems to be trying to say that this is the wrong path for her - but even if she was intended to be one, for me, at least, she's not working as one right now. At least not for that action.



I'm far more familiar with theater than I am with TV shows (it's what I do), and I'd like to mention, in connection with this discussion, a kind of play I've always disliked, which I've nicknamed "the male rape play". I call them that because they're invariably written by men. And they all follow the same general pattern: a woman gets raped by a man, and then she turns the tables on her attacker and tortures and/or kills him. Probably the most well-known play of this type is "Extremities", but I've worked quite a bit as a script reader and I've seen dozens of them, all very similar to each other.



Plays about rape which are written by women never, at least in my experience, follow this pattern. And of the many people I know who have, horribly enough, been raped, including my ex and two of my best friends, not a single one has ever liked one of these plays. Why? Because the "male rape play" presents this kind of revenge as evening things up. The score is settled now, an eye for an eye, and everyone can move on, right?



Wrong.



Getting revenge doesn't erase what happened. Nothing does. The idea that it can I even find a little offensive. I"m not sure why so many men tend to write about rape this way; I think they're trying to be feminist, but aren't quite getting that in this case, payback doesn't really even things up.



I think the Willow/Tara situation, although not the same, is in some ways similar. Killing Warren isn't going to bring Tara back, and it's not going to make Willow feel any better. True, it's going to remove a waste of human flesh from the earth, but beyond that it strikes me as a particularly empty and unhelpful kind of revenge.



I don't know if Willow's actions in regard to Warren were meant to be seen as feminist and empowering. What I've been getting from the show - that these actions are destroying Willow, too - seems to argue against it. The Joss quotes above (I haven't seen "I Spit on Your Grave", but it sounds very similar to the kind of thing I'm talking about) might imply that he *does* see this kind of thing that way. I disagree with him thouroughly if he does.



You know what actions of WIllow's I would have found feminist and empowering? If she'd heroically saved Tara's life, in an ideal world. In the shitty world we've been handed, if she'd brought Warren to justice without sacrificing her personality and beliefs. But I must admit, as a distant, distant, please-this-can't-be-happening third choice, I'd rather see Willow torture Warren to death and have that be clearly the wrong action for her than a show in which she does that and it's portrayed as all wonderful feminist all-problems-solved goodness. Because the last one isn't true. (Although I do admit I certainly would prefer even that to, say, a Tara gets killed, Willow is helpless, and Warren gets away scott-free scenario; that would be the real bottom of the barrel.)



I don't know. I must admit I'm a big fan of Hothead Paisan, and had no objections to, say, Buffy going after Evil Angel with extreme prejudice. Maybe because those were both clearly fantasies. But the Willow/Tara/Warren situation seems horribly real to me somehow. And Willow killing Warren doesn't seem particularly empowering to me, even if it's better than Willow doing nothing. It just seems sad.



--- KR

Edited by: kyraroc at: 5/14/02 7:58:39 pm
kyraroc
 


Re: Is Willow a feminist?

Postby girlwiththebraids » Tue May 14, 2002 9:38 pm

eloquence, xita...good job. seriously...you made me both think, and even think logically about this whole mess.



similar to kyraroc's post, i'm reminded of a genre specific similar idea...in sci fi/fantasy novels, there's a common rape and revenge theme that shows up often in female characters...while some of them are brilliant and well done, like mercedes's lackey's tarma and kethry stories, others are simply pattern and pointless...



DMW could be a feminist warrior in the midst of a season where teh outside world is misogyny...but i don't like the path they took to bring her to that role, and i HATE the warping of who willow is to make her this kind of warrior...i was with dawn in agreeing that human justice isn't enough to make warren pay, but seeing the willow i love do that to him? that wasn't my willow.



so i'm torn. i don't know what to think. but then, that's how i feel about this whole season.



braids

"and it hurts to want everything and nothing at the same time"

girlwiththebraids
 


Say goodnight bitch

Postby Rally » Tue May 14, 2002 11:13 pm

After watching tonight, for about the third time, as many as the 10th time for some scenes... but watching this start to finish tonight. The one thing that struck me is how many times the word "bitch" was used. This coupled with the number of times it was also used in Seeing Red... I am just really curious WTF is up with that.

------------


...more like the evil laugh of ... you're a dead man!

Rally
 


Re: Say goodnight bitch

Postby girlwiththebraids » Tue May 14, 2002 11:35 pm

rally i totally noticed that too, but i thought it was just me...every time it's kind of a jarring moment of what was that?



braids

"and it hurts to want everything and nothing at the same time"

girlwiththebraids
 


Re: Say goodnight bitch

Postby Nic C » Wed May 15, 2002 4:42 pm

Hmmm, very interesting and eloquent ideas, here.



One thing that struck me when I was scrolling through some Beta Bronze posts yesterday (was curious re. the 'outside world' reaction to 'Seeing Red', masochist that I am...), was a comment that SR was very pro-women. For example:

- the juxtaposition of B/S (m-f) rape with W/T (f-f) loving, trusting goodness

- Warren's comments to Buffy, and his use of a gun (which I'm taking as a somewhat phallic weapon of choice)



Warren has been specifically presented as a misogynistic dickhead for much of the season. His fellow geeks far less so, but they display all the classic interests of undersexed, overhormoned teenage boys, lusting after airbrushed, objectivised pictures of women. Their avowed aims in their very first ep included "chicks, chicks, chicks"; Willow mentions they have pictures of "the Vulcan woman on Enterprise"; and, of course, the running commentary of their desires when Warren is on the prowl with the cerebral dampener.



All of the above examples are funny (particularly the latter). But, and I think this is what makes 'Dead Things' such a pivotal ep for this season, things take a turn for the sinister all too quickly. They have these fantasies, ha ha etc - but what happens when they have the toys to turn it into reality? 'Dead Things' was a (heavy-handed) metaphor for date-rape, but it's also perhaps a signifier for the rest of the season. The geeks haven't grown up - haven't learnt (as Katrina tells them) the consequences of their actions. Warren doesn't much care, of course. But then he's a special case.



It feeds into a wider theme that includes Willow, too: that power without responsibility = a Bad Thing. ('Tabula Rasa', etc.) 'Growing up' is all about responsibility, after all.



Willow's revenge on Warren is kinda feministy, in a way, but it's still very destructive. She's still using power without responsibility. Perhaps we're being shown that however justified the ends, we still have to use the means with caution, and responsibility. Which would make it extra important for Giles to return - he's the original example in this series of learning the consequences of one's actions (remember that first Ethan Rayne ep?). Guess that's what Buffy says in SR, although she does it in such an unbearably self-righteous way that I can't really take her seriously ;)



All of this also ties in with the VD/JD thing, I suppose, but I've typed enough already, so I'll shut up now...



(oh, except that - if this season is all about using power responsibly, accepting consequences, and vengeance, shouldn't Anya be critical to the conclusion? reset, I say, reset!)





Nic

Nic C
 


Re: Say goodnight bitch

Postby Banshee » Wed May 15, 2002 5:49 pm

I have to say that this is a brilliant post. We have always heard that Joss created the character of Buffy to counter the 'damsil in distress' cliche that plauged too many horror movies. Unfortunately though he never cared to mention if her friends were feminists, too.

I have not been too popular on the board of late because of my opinion of the show. Unfortunately, it has been misconstrued that my opinion/support for BtVS means that I cannot also dislike or question some aspects of it--because I do.

I rewatched 'villians' today-mostly skipping through the non-Willow parts because I wanted to see if there was something I missed. Again and again, all I heard was the word 'bitch'--being bombarded by it, infact. This is not the writing of a feminist.

I know that the thread is suppose to deal w/Willow--but if we look at other characters, the female ones, then we can see that NOT ONE of them is untouched by misogyny.



Buffy: She's our heroine. The lead icon. The emodiment of the 3rd wave with her strength and fluffy little shirts. A Riot Grrrl, perhaps. But, just two episodes ago, she was raped or was a victim of an attempted rape(I am still unclear of this). Her mission in life is to kill vampires and her attacker was one. Yet, she let him walk away. That act for me was the moment that they disempowered her and erased her from being a feminist icon. And in 'Villians' to ease her sister, she even takes her to him--for protection, no less. I'm sorry, but regardless of what my sister was going through, I wouldn't take her to my assualter for protection. And, if we want to think even more into this just the sheer fact that she has needed Spike at all this season shows that the female still needs to the male to help her fight her battles.



Anya: She's your atypical gold digger--all about the money-- and the man-hater.. Which, by just the latter stereotype alone means that she should have been made the lesbian, doesn't it? So, she's a vengence demon who can't partake in vengence against the man that scorned her? She just kind of takes it. But, she's got friends in this little business doesn't she? Like 1200 years on the planet and you haven't made friends who can ennact some vengence for you even if it's not in the form of a wish? I'm not buying it. Not that being a feminist=revenge, but it does mean more than, when you first seeing the man that hurt you, asking him 'so, do you want to still marry me?"



Tara: If anyone, she has gotten the complete shaft of the series. It's elluded to that her father has molested her, she has social issues(ie, shyness and stuttering related to it) and then she gets killed. But, only after her gf, becomes an addict and her brain is sucked. In a way, Joss has taken 'the blonde in distress' off of Buffy and made Tara the victim.



Drusilla: I'm adding her because of this: it was believed in medicine that women, pretty much across the board, were crazy. The word 'hysterectomy' comes from the word 'hysteria' because they believed that the reproductive organs of women made them overly sensetive and emotional. So, Drusilla was pretty much the embodiment of that sentiment.



Willow: She's the second one down from the top on the list of people completely fucked by this show. Is she a feminist icon? No, in my opinion, she isn't. Maybe she would have been if they didn't also include a little bit of her own 'hysteria' in going after Warren. They've given her a shitload of mother issues and keep her power in something that is evil and not found within herself. She is not allowed to be strong unless she is also bad and evil and out of control.



I have not included Dawn because she has not been allowed to come into her own this season--for the most part she was merely your angsty, whiny adolescent.











Believe me I don't want to go

And it'll grieve me 'cause I love you so

But we both know....

Banshee
 


Re: Say goodnight bitch

Postby xita » Wed May 15, 2002 8:59 pm

After watching this thing again, I have to add and say that I think Willow was using the bullet to "rape" Warren. The way she tears the shirt and the slow penetration of the bullet was a metaphorical rape, adding to the whole "I spit on your grave" type of "feminist" revenge.

- - - - - - - - - - - -

"Everything is turning out so dark..."

"No, it's okay. Lost is good. Willow and I always know how to find each other!"

xita
 


Re: Say goodnight bitch

Postby tommo » Wed May 15, 2002 9:24 pm

Well, there's a difference between Feminist and Feminist Icon. Although you know, they've stripped Willow of her power by giving her dark powers. It's all negative and reflects negatively on aspects of empowering a woman to enact some kind of vengeance. This isn't what I want young women to see and hold as a role model. This lacks nobility.


----------
"Smut now." - Dark Madfic Tommo

tommo
 


nope

Postby Drusilla » Wed May 15, 2002 10:21 pm

definetly someone i dont romodel, not this willow...this isnt even willow, someone evil is just impersonating our Willow. not someone i would want to have as a role model.

Drusilla
 


Re: nope

Postby tommo » Wed May 15, 2002 10:33 pm

Whereas the old Willow, I could have at least held up as a role model in some ways. But now? Nah...


----------
"Smut now." - Dark Madfic Tommo

tommo
 


Re: nope

Postby Drusilla » Wed May 15, 2002 11:04 pm

the old willow is gone....that makes me feel so depressed. and its not going to get any better by watching next weeks episode.

Drusilla
 


Re: nope

Postby tommo » Wed May 15, 2002 11:18 pm

No, that's right. But you know, in terms of feminism, I just wish I knew what ME were trying to tell us. For a show that's always held up the Slayer as a prime example of female empowerment, they're doing a shitty job this season.


----------
"Smut now." - Dark Madfic Tommo

tommo
 


Re: Is Willow a feminist?

Postby WiccansIllusion » Thu May 16, 2002 12:06 am

I think that a lot have missed the 'Bored Now' reference.



Willow died along with Tara, and I think ME reverted back to season...3? With Vamp Willow. This new, and not improved version of Willow is basically dead, Vamp Willow.



This is also another way that M.E has foreshadowed an entire season before hand. The non forgettable : "Be home before Dawn." -forget which season



and also the season2/3 episode that ended with the group of them sitting in the courtyard, blank expressions on their faces as they state the whole " We're never going to have real relationships."

'It's good to be a chicken casserole'-Sass, answering darkness

'My heart is cleverer then I and it knows what to do.'-MC Legends of the Kiss

WiccansIllusion
 


Re: Is Willow a feminist?

Postby tommo » Thu May 16, 2002 12:33 am

Okay, in a jump to get this thread back on topic, I think I'm ready to talk a bit more clearly about some of the issues here.



Quote:
there is evidence that he has given this kind of plot some thought. DMW is perhaps the avenging force for women this season, though it all depends on how she is portrayed in the next few episodes. While this event may be triumphant, the effects of it may be too damaging. I hope not, I hope that DMW is not eventually seen as the true enemy in her quest to end the world.




Okay, yes. I agree with the idea that we are supposed, in some way, to see DMW as the "female avenger". In a way, she's righting the wrongs that Warren as the inherent masculine intruder has perpetuated. If he is seen as the "male" figure, who has not only attacked (physically and mentally) strong female characters, then DMW has some feminist attributes in setting those situations right once more. But I liked the idea of it being "too damaging", because DMW takes on a destructive role in her efforts to avenge Tara's death. Not only does she represent the form of woman as a strong figure against man, but she also gives us the image of that woman only able to bring "man" to justice by evil means. Honestly, I think that negates the whole idea of empowerment, because it's not empowerment in a true sense, just in an abstract sense. And that's not what I loved about the show, originally.



Quote:
Again, for this theory I really had to set aside the fact that this is Willow, I could see myself pulling a DMW before I could see her doing it. I also had to set aside that he had to kill Tara to do this. I don't think either one of these is necessary, it wasn't necessary to use the lesbians to do this. Buffy perhaps would have been a better vehicle, perhaps even Anya. Because it is too easy to cross the line between man hater and lesbian, where those issues would not be present in an Anya or buffy scenario and you wouldn't need to touch the lesbian cliche.




Yes, and this is where I think the show has failed to continue in its efforts to give us a feminist slant. The actions and reactions of the character don't sit well with the storyline that she's drawn into. But I think it's convenient to link the "angry embittered lesbian" stereotype with what could be conceived as a "feminist backlash" against what Warren does, and what he is made to be on the show. Even in the midst of his suffering at the hands of Willow, he's still shown to be too caught up in his own hatred of women (the use of the word "bitch" when talking to Katrina) to even consider what kind of fate that might bring him. And the lesson to be learned, if any, is that you can still laugh at a "feminist avenger" even when she's holding your death up in front of you. It makes a mockery of what I think ME are trying to do here; because Warren didn't understand anything at all just before he died.



I think this is a really tired cliche. It's overused and it has lessened in importance to me. I want to see a strong woman because she's strong; emotionally and intellectually. I always thought that I saw that in Willow. To me, she was a feminist even before I knew how to categorise what that was. She was a good example of how to survive with a sense of self in this world. Losing her to DMW, however, has made her character retreat into parody and charicature. It's not feminism; it's someone's idea of feminism. Radical or not, it doesn't portray anything about the "female" that I want to see.






----------
"Smut now." - Dark Madfic Tommo

tommo
 


Re: Is Willow a feminist?

Postby Killin Joke » Thu May 16, 2002 10:51 am

Oeh, interesting thread ! :) Thanks, Xita, for starting it, and the others for delivering so many indepth posts already. There's definitely an intelligent bunch of kittens to be found here. Since I'm gonna write my thesis about "amazons" next year, if I pass this year, everything resembling feminism, is immensely intriguing to me. (If amazons weren't allowed, I would have asked if I could portray "the image of witches/witchcraft in English literature" -> a gal'gotta have a good back-up plan ;) ) Now, to answer the question (sort of): Yes, I think Willow's a bit of a feminist, at least, in the true, good sense of the word. Mind you, I might have to adjust my opinion after having seen the finale. I've grown to love Will, despite of the flaws, which we all have, and what makes her human. I could really relate to her (and Tara for that matter) because I've been through a similar process of evolution. She started out as this somewhat shy, bookish, computerwizz, with a bad fashionsense (at least according to Cordy), funny babbling,... and grew into this confident powerfull Wicca, lesbian, etc. Up till now, I've always felt that she could hold her own in the wicked world she lives in. She was a valid member of the Scooby Gang, she wasn't portraited as inferior to men but wasn't a bra-burning (granted: Warren-burning ) men-hating radical (see: coffee-talk with Tara and Anya). The way she handled things in her own Willowy way: the experimental/puppydog love for Xander, her bond with Oz, her cute kitten, real relationship with soulmate Tara, next to her studies, dodging apocalypses and the likes: it all fitted the picture perfectly: well-written, portraited. As for this last season (which I rushed through in a couple of days, with some eps, pieces, bits missing) : it was dark, about maturing, and I could actually understand how the magic-addiction came to pass: insecurity that goes way back, having to deal with this all-overpowering feeling of love she never knew before,... They didn't have to (the addiction-element was already there with Riley and his vamps) but they did, so I made the most of it. As much as it hurt Tara to do what she did, she made the right decision to leave Will for a while, as a sort of shock-therapy, to give her the space to sort things out. They could have done that together, you say: I'd rather have seen that too, but Tara's also a wiccan: it could have complicated things. Anyway, Will got the time to work things out on her own, and therefor I was sooo damn proud of her (as was Tara). Very adult-like. I also loved the way they showed Will and Tara, when they were apart: still very much in love, friendly, protective of each other... As far as "Villains" is concerned, I tried to put myself in Willow's place, and I have to admit: normally I'm this calm, kind, warm-hearted person, but if they would touch my loved ones, I could turn into a cold-hearted bitch... Especially if I'd have to deal with such strong issues as murder, rape (don't get me started on Buffy: well, maybe later on). Some of you have already mentioned that it would have worked with a best friend as well. Buff's a bad example right now, but if Spike had done to Dawn, what he tried with her... I think she wouldn't have been that preachy (and wanting to leave Dawn alone with Spike, after all she knows... uch). What I'm trying to say is, that I could understand Will's wrath towards Warren. Sure, it's not "right" (what is in life ? -> oh, that's right: Willow and Tara together, alive, safe and sound) but it's plausible in my definition of "feminism". I think I couldn't live with the thought that the murderer/rapist of my beloved was still alive. Will it make her feel better ? Of course not. Nothing will (except to have her sweetheart with her again) but it's something that has to be done, needs to happen, in order to make a miserable attempt at moving on. It's justice: plain and simple. But, and now we're gonna have it, what with the other events that are still in store for us: Jonathan, Andrew (that's his name, huh ? -> yeah, I really paid attention to the nerd herd this season /sigh/) and most importantly her friends ? How can you justify her actions towards them ? Blind rage ? "The Black Magic made me do it" ? I've always recognized parts of Willow till now. No woman is ever 100 % (the) angel (in the house), the Holy Mary-figure, or the other opposition: the devil, the whore, some men have always wanted them to be. Same goes for Willow: she's this wonderful young woman, with heaps of qualities, but she also has a problem, her craving for magic, which she isn't able to control anymore. I think I'll have to see the last eps in that light: that the Dark Force takes over... The Willow we know wouldn't deliberately hurt her friends, or innocents without a good reason. Self-defence, defend yourself in battle: sure, but this... Somehow it reminded me of this quote:+/- like this: "Xena, promise me something. Promise me you won't become a monster, after I'm gone/dead." (Gabby to Xe) I can understand that Willow can block out her emotions for Tara, and sets her goals on revenge, but after that... You know what ? I guess I'm gonna blame the writers. I love a good ass-kicking bad girl, as the next one, but that's why we have characters like Faith,... Somehow I find it hard to believe there's nothing good in Willow left that she loses it completely, the power is too strong and takes over entirely, but I have to settle for it. It's not as if we have any choice Then again: she has nothing more to live for: sure, Dawnie is supportive, and her friends weren't that shabby all the time in her past, but I'm right with her at this moment. I'm curious as hell what they're gonna try to pull off in the last eps... The last season is supposed to be cheery, back to basics, and all, but without a living Tara: either Will commits suicide or will be unabashedly bawling her eyes out (Alanis Morisette) the whole season, all or not supported by the friendly ghost Tara. Oh, puhlease ! Hello ! /knock, knock/ Anybody home there ? It's been done ! Been there, done that, Deja-vu all over again, or should I say FIN (no not Riley Finn, Friends in Need: last Xena-scene). At least Tapert had the decency to do it in the last ep, so we wouldn't have to witness a season with Gab talking to air, being labeled the village fool because of it. Then again: Buffy dates vamps, Xander (ex)-demons, why can't Will have a ghost ? The ultimate example that love transcends everything... Sure... Sorry, I have been analyzing way too much Xena-episodes, looking for comforting theories. Willow and Tara were supposed to be my blissful therapy, and now they're taking that away from me too. Hmm, I wonder what they will do in the next season of Bad Girls (UK series, behind bars)... I've read some spoilers about another attempted rape and a vengeful lesbian: be original for a chance, guys. Ah well, at least they still live. I could come up with worse scenario's than the Will/Faith one in the slammer. It wouldn't surprise me if the bastards dug up Oz (if they didn't link her to Xander, but then again: he'll probably end up with B) in a lousy attempt to comfort Willow (flashback: Iolaus consoling Gabby) /shiver/ Ok, now I'm officially depressed. Won't have it. Hope Willow blows up Sunnydale (except maybe for Dawnie, and Anya, if she's willing to fight beside her), so that a wish/time travel/reversal-thingie is in order, because the stupid writers have screwed up so pathetically. Though after reading the David Fury-interview, my last hopes are kinda crushed. Let him lie, sweet Nemesis, I hope he's a titannical liar like the rest of 'm. Tapert lied, so maybe someone could lie in a good (blank stare) way for a chance... Anyway, I'm planning on broadening my horizons and begin writing some Tara/Willow-fanfiction, maybe post it here, since you have such an artistic corner around here. Tried my hands on some Xena/Buffy/Charmed-cross-over once, and now I'm thinking Xena, Tara and Prue could hook up to do some serious damage, come up with this gigantic plan to dazzle the world of the living... F*ck this nightmare, I'm off to dreamland. Hugs to everyone ! ;)

Killin Joke
 


Re: Is Willow a feminist?

Postby tyche » Fri May 17, 2002 3:19 am

Fascinating post, xita. It got me thinking as to how all the women in the Buffyverse who have special powers get punished, and how the male characters generally don't. Interesting that on a supposedly feminist show, women are punished for having power...

Dawn

Daw was pure energy and had the power to end the world during season 5. For this, she loses her mother, her sister and her surrogate mother.

Willow

Well, see above. She is corrupted by her powers and ends up a killer.

Anya

Her punishment for being a powerful vengeance demon (one who specifically took up the cause of wronged women) was to become human.

Tara

Uses magic; is not corrupted by power but ends up dead. Although she did nothing to deserve or bring about her death, it can nevertheless be seen (by idiots) as 'punishment' for being a magic user.

Jenny

Uses magic, contributes towards Angel becoming Angelus again, ends up dead as a result.

Cordelia

Has visions which cause her huge amounts of pain, and some snazzy new powers, which will no doubt cause her even more pain in the future.

Fred

Studied physics; ended up in Pylea as a slave for 5 years as a result, was only able to get back with Angel's help.

Buffy

Has strength and special powers as a Slayer; suffers 6 years of misery as a result (loss of Angel, dying twice, being resurrected in hugely traumatic way etc. etc.)

Faith

Corrupted by Slayer powers, ends up evil, then in jail.

Compare and contrast to the men with special powers (vampires having special strength, fighting powers etc.):

Angel

Mass murderer, killed lawyers last season, tried to murder Wesley, gets off scot-free.

Giles

Used magic without being truly corrupted by power, killed Ben, gets off scot-free.

Xander

Used magic resulting in death of unspecified number of Sunnydale citizens, gets off scot-free.

Spike

Unrepentant mass murderer, tried to rape Buffy, gets off scot-free.

Are we spotting a pattern here? The only male character who ever suffered as a result of being 'special' was Oz, who suffered werewolf-related angst. The message being, if you're a woman in the Buffyverse, and you have power or attempt to use it, you will be punished.

You took my joy

I want it back
- Lucinda Williams

Discussion group for spoiled W/T shippers

tyche
 


Re: Is Willow a feminist?

Postby cachaco » Fri May 17, 2002 4:51 am

[Mods, please delete if inappropriate.]



While I agree that the women with power get punished disproportionately, I don't think the men get off scot-free. (Maybe I'm getting OT here, so I'll be quick.) Angel: cursed with a soul, feels the collective weight of all his crimes, basically spends his life atoning for past deeds, has a doomed love with buffy, dissed by cordelia when he finally starts to open up to her, has a kid who's taken away from him. Giles: one lover killed, one (possibly) driven away by the Gentlemen, fired from his destiny/life's calling, basically has no life. Spike: emasculated (been rewatching the S4 eps where he first gets the chip, they repeatedly call it impotence), shat upon by everyone (albeit deservedly), condemned to a pathetic excuse for a vampire existence, reduced to killing his own kind. ok, he did get off scot-free for trying to rape buffy, but that's just 'cause he immediately skipped town. but they're setting him up to pay next season. Xander: Fucked up the one good thing he had in his life by leaving Anya at the altar. He's basically stuck with a life he didn't want that he's proceeded to make even shittier through his own fuck-ups. He's lame and he knows it, just keeps making it worse. It's his own fault, but he's not getting off scot-free.



Again, no arguing that it's disproportionate, and i'm not trying to defend anything or anyone here. I just don't think anyone really gets off scot-free in the buffyverse.



Anyway, back OT, this thread makes me want to see I Spit on Your Grave. They're really playing the misogyny angle so hard, I can't help but think you're on to something with this, xita. But folks are right, the messages are just too mixed for any of it to have much impact as it was intended. Bah.





Edited by: cachaco at: 5/17/02 3:53:42 am
cachaco
 


Re: Is Willow a feminist?

Postby darvangi » Fri May 17, 2002 9:11 am

I'm glad you brought this up, Xita. Seeing DMW's actions against Warren as feminist revenge is a very cathartic idea in itself, because it allows me to enjoy, at the very least, something about this wack-ass storyline.



What interests me most is how DMW contrasts with Buffy and her attitude of acceptance/forgiveness with Spike following his rape attempt on her. The fact that she didn't dust him (the only demon-world equivalent of having a human rapist prosecuted) or allow Xander to do it for her upset me. She is clearly not thinking in terms of respect for her own dignity, which shows a lack of pride in herself as a woman, and prideful assertiveness is something Buffy desperately needs to regain. DMW, on the other hand, is quick to take action against a mysoginist who has been violent to women. Since we can agree that this current incarnation isn't truly Willow, can DMW be seen as the embodiment of the assertive strength that Buffy is lacking? I believe so.



Yes, the bullet was a kind of rape. A violent torture through penetration that coincides with the ripping off of his skin, an act which seems to suggest the ripping off of clothes from a rape victim - a stripping of dignity. It is a harsh, eye-for-an-eye retaliation that mirrors Warren's attempted rape/murder of Katrina and his own bullet penetration of Tara, and through the gruesomeness of it, Buffy is seeing how far removed she has become from the act of fighting violence with violence, anger with anger. The true heroic nature she needs to regain lies somewhere in between her own current docility and DMW's pure violence.



I don't think that the entirety of the DMW arc will concern feminist revenge, but the combination of that with the Buffy post-rape story will culminate in the repair of the feminist heroic figure we've grownt o miss this season.



Edited to add: I want to make sure y'all know that I'm not condoning the events of this disappointing season and the horrible betrayal of Tara's death by writing the above remarks - I'm just exploring the very thin silver lining on the dark-ass cloud that is S6.

Edited by: darvangi at: 5/17/02 10:34:15 am
darvangi
 


Re: Is Willow a feminist?

Postby xita » Fri May 17, 2002 12:06 pm

Yes, Darin that is how I feel and why I wrote this was to try to make sense of why such a feminist show would do what they did this season and that it is why I think that DMW in Villains was not set up to be the bad guy necessarily. That being said, next week's episodes could lose the message of that entirely.



And yes you are right Buffy is still much too passive and should have staked Spike. There is no reason for her lack on innaction except that she has no self respect. I am as disturbed by this whole plot as I am as the brutal senseless murder of Tara.



I don't think this show can ever come back from the dark shadow of season 6. I can listen to David Fury and know he did not want the hero to go through this but he was convinced that the arch needed it and that this was not Buffy. However, it romanticized the villain and never really put women in control of themselves and their bodies, the way this show has always done. I am not sure that they can ever fix that, or what they did to Tara.

- - - - - - - - - - - -

"Everything is turning out so dark..."

"No, it's okay. Lost is good. Willow and I always know how to find each other!"

Edited by: xita  at: 5/17/02 11:08:14 am
xita
 


Re: Is Willow a feminist?

Postby maudmac » Fri May 17, 2002 4:35 pm

If Joss intended to highlight Willow as a feminist icon through this arc, he's failed.



It could be argued that I Spit on Your Grave (interestingly, also known as Day of the Woman) succeeds in this regard, mostly because it's very straightforward. Men rape woman, woman tortures and kills those men. The protagonist is not addicted to dark magicks and does not seek to destroy the world, she simply destroys her attackers. End of story.



It can further be argued that Hothead Paisan succeeds as well, at least in avoiding the sticky issue of Is This Truly Feminist? because it is pure fantasy, stated clearly as such by the author, Diane DiMassa.



Willow's arc is neither straightforward nor pure fantasy. Joss has intended the audience to identify with her from day one. Are we still supposed to be identifying with her? Willow has been becoming increasingly morally ambiguous for years now. Are we intended to view this as a cautionary tale?



Justice and revenge are different, though similar and often overlapping, objectives. It's not hard to see why so many of us see the line between them as blurry. It is. One crucial difference is that vengeance is ultimately harmful to the avenger. How many of us have spent a lot of years hating people who hurt us (our abusers, our molesters, our rapists) before we realized that that hatred was slowly killing us? Another crucial difference is that revenge is never-ending, whereas justice seeks to stop the cycle. (In theory at least!)



I submit that while Willow is not a feminist icon, it's possible VengeanceWillow is intended to be. But the writers have muddled the story by creating a Willow who isn't Willow. This may have been intended as a means to absolve Willow of responsibility for AddictWillow or VengeanceWillow's actions. This is not ultimately a feminist message.



VengeanceWillow is the most powerful human ever? Her intentions? To destroy the world. How is that a feminist message? See, that's where this fails. It could be argued that this arc is an I Spit on Your Grave-style message of "Don't fuck with women!" up to the point where VW decides to take the whole world down with her. At that point, it becomes decidedly anti-feminist. It begins saying, "See, women really are irrational and overly emotional and ultimately their power is dangerous. We are right to subjugate them." And, after all, that's what rape is about, isn't it? Asserting power and domination over women, making certain that we never forget that we are helpless, lesser, weaker, useful only as vehicles for our attackers' objectives. And, of course, we have no role in determining those objectives.



I can't fathom Joss' intentions for this arc, for his treatment of Willow, Tara, or Buffy. Or anyone else, for that matter. He's lost me.



And, yeah, Buffy should have staked Spike. Her not doing so smacks of some kind of Battered Woman Syndrome deal where the woman seeks to protect her abuser. This is the antithesis of a "feminist icon." (I realize many of us may have been victims of long-term abuse in our lives and struggled mightily to overcome the myriad of issues related to that. I in no way mean to imply that victims of abuse are weak, but this is Buffy I'm talking about.)

---------------------------
Sweet is the road just discovered that seems to whisper your name as song.-- Lydia Lunch, Toxic Gumbo

maudmac
 


Re: Is Willow a feminist?

Postby Killin Joke » Fri May 17, 2002 8:13 pm

Funny (well, in the most messed up - isn't that ironic - way) thing some of you should mention the movie "I spit on your grave". Haven't seen it myself yet, but Kimberly Goss, the singer of the metalband Sinergy (also a Xena-fan, with a couple of songs based on it -> no discovery of W/T-based lyrics yet ?) was inspired by it and wrote the following lyrics



I spit on your grave



Vengeance piercing through my heart

as I watch you kiss the dirt

and make you swallow your betrayel ans sin

Though for now I say farewell

but one day I will return with a smile

as I spit on your grave !



I'm sick... tired of this abuse

I've played the fool for many years

Escape... shelter me from harm



Your lies... pushed me to the edge

I've finally reached my breaking point

Come here... meet your nemesis



Vengeance piercing through my heart

as I watch you kiss the dirt

and make you swallow your betrayel and sin

Though for now I say farewell

but one day I will return with a smile

as I spit on your grave !



Taste this... swift thrust of my blade

it's laced with poison from my veins

Lay there... helpless and afraid



You bleed... I gaze with a grin,

a taste of your own medecine

Your tears... please the beast within



solo 1: Laiho - solo 2: Laiho & Latvala - solo 3: Latvala



Vengeance piercing through my heart

as I watch you kiss the dirt

and make you swallow your betrayel and sin

Though for now I say farewell

but one day I will return with a smile

as I spit on your grave!



Yes, right now I say farewell

but one day I will return with a smile

as I spit on your grave!

___________________________________________________



Not the most kind-hearted lyrics, I admit, but I have the feeling that I'll be listening to the album "Suicide by my side" a lot in the future. Somehow reflects Will's feelings and that of the fans towards the people who inflicted this stupid arc upon us. Willow, who has always been such a warm person, losing touch with herself completely in the final eps... Vengeance I can understand, but crossing the boundaries of revenge: difficult to grasp (if at all possible). And I have also been experiencing problems with the degeneration of Buffy. It wasn't love she had for Spike: she made that perfectly clear, but for the supposedly heroine of the series to give in to her sexual urges entirely: "pretty whack" (Dark Angel) Was this a consequence of her being raised from the dead ? Tara double-checked and there was nothing wrong with her. BTW, that was a real surprising touching scene. I've seen Buffy open up to Tara before (hug, when she was in her post-Riley period, talk at the hospital after mum died) but this came somehow unexpected. Beautiful scene: showed what an important part Tara has become in the Scoobies' life. /sigh/ I don't get it, at least not completely. This season has actually been realistic in spreading adult-themes. I loved the way Tara has opened up, how Will and her interacted, managed to sort things out, and then they pull this stunt. Everything wasn't all lost. Buffy could have become enraged, after reacting like a zombie lately, and dust Spike. But nooo, as clever people have mentioned here Willow becomes the personification of the avenger of (girl)friends, fans,... Buff could have realized she should pay more attention to Dawn and talk to her (in stead of Giles, W/T all the time) Xander and Anya: Xan, behaving like the prototypical male this season, would probably not forgive Anya for sleeping with Spike, but they could have at least talk things through. Next to XWP, BtVS has always struck me as a show that celibrated feminism, how playful it might look sometimes. The constant struggle between: when to fight, use magic, when to talk, etc. is fascinating. This season wasn't as balanced as the others: realism, bordering at naturalism, almost only showing the dark side of life... I like my characters complicated, not flat, but I also expect them to raise a bit above the level of us ordinary real life mortals, if that makes sense. Like, take rape/fysical abuse for instance: in reality you often know people who undergo it, and aren't able to alter their situation, react against it. I had expected to see that on one of my favourite television shows at least: now it just comes too close to the gloomy coin of life. No fun. However, I did wrote my first W/T smut today (posted in a thread) : that kinda put a mischievous smile on my face. /blows virtual comforting kisses before leaving/

Killin Joke
 

Next

Return to Board index

Return to Witches and Vixens

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests


Powered by phpBB The phpBB Group © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007
Style based on a Cosa Nostra Design